Saturday, December 11, 2021

Beecham's Pills, Beecham's Magic Cough Pills and Beecham's Tooth Paste

Beecham’s Pills, Beecham’s Magic Cough Pills and Beecham’s Toothpaste

Beecham’s Cough Pills for chest affections
Beecham’s Pills Best family medicine
Beecham’s Pills for constipation.
Beecham’s Pills for disordered liver.
Beecham’s Pills for female complaints.
Beecham’s Pills for impaired digestion.
Beecham’s Pills for nervous ills.
Beecham’s Pills for sick headache.
Beecham’s Pills Great colonial demand.
Beecham’s Pills invigorate the nerves.
Beecham’s Pills purify the blood.
Beecham’s Pills restore appetite.
Beecham’s Pills stand unrivalled.
Beecham’s Pills The leading remedy.
Beecham’s Pills The premier medicine.
Beecham’s Pills The world’s medicine.
Beecham’s Pills Worth a guinea a box.
Beecham’s Tooth Paste, in tubes 1/-
Stamp Beecham’s Pills on your mind.
Try Beecham’s Tooth Paste
 

Overview

Although overshadowed by the Sunlight Soap adverts, Beechams was a major advertiser and - uniquely - had their designs in a contiguous block, of size 4x5, in the bottom right pane of the sheet. Beecham was a British patent medicine vendor and advertised its two pills and toothpaste: Beecham’s Pills (a laxative), Beecham’s Cough Pills and Beecham’s Tooth Paste. One Beecham slogan - "Worth a Guinea a Box" - entered the popular culture of the day. Beecham’s presence in New Zealand during the nineteenth century was apparently vestigial: there are the syndicated newspaper adverts, the stamp adverts, an anti-forgery agent, and little else. There is not even any sign of a local distributor.
 

Beecham Company Beginnings

The founder of the first, Thomas Beecham, was born in Curbridge, Oxfordshire, England in 1820. His beginnings were humble and worked as a shepherd’s boy at age eight. There he learnt about herbal medicine and sold herbal remedies as a sideline [WikiBeechTom] [WikiBeechGrp].
As a young man of twenty he moved some 14 miles eastwards to the larger village of Kidlington, undertaking casual work such as the village postman. He also sold laxative pills of his own invention in nearby markets; these were made with the help of his brother in law [GraceBeecham].
Two years later, in 1842, Thomas Beecham went into business with his pills, now known as Beecham's Pills. He became a charismatic travelling salesman, offering his pills in different parts of the country [GraceBeecham] [LetLookAgainBeecham].
Perhaps Thomas Beecham already had pharmaceutical ambitions because he transferred 160 miles north to the manufacturing heartland of England. In 1847 he married Jane Evans of Bangor, Wales in Liverpool. At the time he described himself as a labourer, suggesting that his pill business was not doing well. The newlyweds settled in Wigan, where Thomas continued to make Beecham’s Pills, and other medicines, and sell them at markets around the town. Soon he was able to open a shop there; and in 1848, at the baptism of his first child, Joseph, he described himself as a "medicine vendor".
The building known as Beechams Clock Tower, originally part of Beechams Factory and now a part of the modern St. Helens College [WikiBeechamBlg]

His Wigan shop failed in 1859 yet, undeterred, the family moved nine miles to the south west, to St. Helens, a coal mining and glass making town north of the River Mersey. Here Thomas opened Beecham’s first factory. Reportedly, this factory was the first to be opened solely for the manufacture of medicines [GraceBeecham]. The Beecham firm became an entrenched feature of the town, with its headquarters at the gracious Beecham Clock Tower from 1877 [WikiBeechGrp].
Thomas’s eldest son, Joseph Beecham joined the family firm in 1866 [WikiBeechJos]. He was described as "[in] personal appearance ... the quiet, pipe-smoking, tweed-clad type of Englishman. He has neither business nor artistic pose, and is modesty itself" [LetLookAgainBeecham].
Beechams was reportedly exporting their remedies to Australia in 1875 [GraceBeecham], yet there is an earlier Australian newspaper record for when A.J. Watt & Co, a dispensing chemist at 528 George St, Sydney, imported Beecham Pills in 1873 [SydMornHer1873Mar27P2] [SydArchWatt].
Thomas’ eldest son, Joseph Beecham, took effective control of the company in 1881 even though Thomas remained as the formal leader of the company into the mid-1890s [WikiBeechTom]. Joseph was regarded as a superior businessman than his father and, in what would be a major feature of the company thereafter, Joseph increased the company’s advertising expenditures considerably [CorleyBeechamGrp] [EncycBizBeecham]. For instance, in December 1884, the first Beecham advert appears in an Australian newspaper [Argus1884Dec19P7].
Joseph was also responsible for Beechams’ new factory and office in Westfield Street, St. Helens, being built in 1885 [WikiBeechamJos], wherein the employees were mostly boys. There was no laboratory or research staff whatsoever, although the firm did regularly test the pill ingredients for quality. As well, "there were a limited number of wholesale agents, and its travelers were largely concerned with tracking down pill counterfeiters." [CorleyBeechamGrp]. Joseph Beecham opened a distribution business in New York in 1888, then a factory there in 1890 [EncycBizBeecham].
 

The Ingredients and Medical Efficacy

Beecham’s Pills
Beecham’s Pills "actually did have a positive effect on the digestive process. This effectiveness made them stand out from other remedies for sale in the mid-19th century." Indeed their manufacture was only discontinued in 1998 [WikiBeechamPill].
In their early days, Beecham’s Pills were sold in a box of 56 pills for 1/- 1½d. The cost of raw materials was estimated in 1909 as 1/8d, although the value was always marketed as a guinea a box [SecretRemCostContain1909]. The pills were described as "composed entirely of medicinal herbs" but that was only true for two of the three ingredients:
  • Aloe: 0.5 grain (32.4 mg)
  • Powdered ginger: 0.55 grain (35.6 mg)
  • Powdered soap: 0.18 grain (11.7 mg)
A circular distributed with the pills claimed they cured "constipation, headache, dizziness or swimming in the head, wind, pain and spasms in the stomach, pains in the back, restlessness, insomnia, indigestion, want of appetite, fullness after meals, vomitings, sickness of the stomach, bilious or liver complaints, sick headaches, cold chills, flushings of heat, lowness of spirits, and all nervous affections, scurvy and scorbutic affections [i.e., affections related to scurvy], pimples and blotches on the skin, bad legs, ulcers, wounds, maladies of indiscretion [STDs?], kidney and urinary disorders, and menstrual derangements."
Given the purgative nature of the ingredients, the bolded items seem like they could be plausibly treated by the pills. The last item is bold due to [Tring1982, p182] which reports that both bowel movement and menstruation "were sometimes amendable to treatment which induced contractions or peristalsis". Scurvy and scorbutic affections are bolded since aloe and ginger do contain small amount of vitamin C, and aloe improves the absorption of vitamin C [GingerHeaBene] [AloeVeraRev] [AloeVerBioavailC].
The circular further reported "Beecham’s Pills are no more an abortifacient than Epson salts." [Tring1982, p182].
An earlier analysis, from 1894 [AucklandStar1894Feb03P4Supp], reported that the pills were composed of two parts aloe, two parts ginger, and one part soap. This analysis is roughly in agreement with the 1909 results.
 
Beecham’s Magic Cough Pills
The ingredients for the cough pills all had a strong pedigree of helping coughing and associated symptoms - plus apparently a notorious ingredient for pain relief. Like Beecham’s pills, Beecham’s Cough Pills were also sold in boxes of 56 pills for 1/- 1½d. Again there was some questionable marketing since the included circular reported that "they do not contain opium" yet by some reports they contained opium’s most important ingredient, morphine, among the five ingredients [SecretRemCostContain1909]:
  • Morphine: 0.0035 grain (0.23 mg) [typical modern analgesic doses are 15-200mg [MedScapeMorphine]
  • Powdered squill: 0.1 grain (6.5 mg) [Squill is the common name for certain lily-like plants, and maritime squill is still used in some modern cough syrups [RansomNatSquill]]
  • Powdered aniseed: 0.3 grain (19.4 mg) [A flowering plant, it has been used as an expectorant and to sooth bronchial irritation [HerbWisAniseed]
  • Ammoniacum: 0.3 grain (19.4 mg) [Gum resin exuded by a wild carrot-like plant, and used since antiquity to treat respiratory issues, excess phlegm, chronic coughs and bronchitis [ApthAmmoniacum]]
  • Extract of licorice: 0.4 grain (25.9 mg) [Extract from the root of a flowering plant from the bean family, with a long history of herbal use including as a cough suppressant and expectorant [WikiLic] [PubMedLicorice]]
The circular enclosed in the box went as follows: "Persons suffering from Cough and kindred troubles should relieve their mind of the idea that nothing will benefit them unless it be in the form of a lozenge, or taken as a liquid. Let them try Beecham’s Cough Pills, and they will never regret it. The Cough Pills do not contain opium; they do not constipate; they do not upset the stomach. On the first symptoms of a Cold or Chill, a timely dose of Beecham’s Cough Pills will invariably ward off dangerous features. For years many families have used no other Winter Medicine. Householders and travellers should avail themselves of the good, safe, and simple remedy for Coughs in general, Asthma, Bronchial Affections, Hoarseness, Shortness of Breath, Tightness and Oppression of the Chest, Wheezing, etc. The dose may be from three to six pills morning, noon and night."
Later we learn the rule of thumb "two for adults and one for a child" [Star1890Mar15P3], so it seems that the "three to six" pills is per day (not per dose), and then the box supplied 9 days’ worth of pills for an adult or 18 days’ worth for a child. The reported daily dose of morphine would then be 0.68-1.36 mg, and the entire box held 12.2 mg of morphine.
 
Beecham’s Tooth Paste
In the second half the nineteenth century, the diet of the average Britain changed appreciably:
  • Cheaper sugar heralded a dramatic increase in sugar consumption via treacles, jams and chocolate (we’re looking at you Frys and Cadbury Bros!)
  • Bread became softer because it was made from finer flour, because in turn flour was now produced using roller milling and the hard bran was sifted from the flour by way of a silk gauze filter.
Oral micro-organisms consumed the sugar to create lactic acid that attacked tooth enamel; and meanwhile the softer breads did not stimulate as much saliva production. It was a perfect storm of tooth decay [MiskellCavProtBizHistRev2004, p34-35].
It took some decades for science to catch up: what were the root causes and how could they be stymied? Regular brushing to remove food particles was clearly a good idea, and recommended by dentists, but fluoride was not proven as a therapy until the 1930s.
Accordingly it doesn’t really matter what the ingredients of Beecham’s toothpaste were, because none of them could be called active ingredients (despite marketing claims to the contrary) [MiskellCavProtBizHistRev2004, p36].
The "collapsible metal tube" was first used for paints in 1841, and early materials included tin, zinc, or lead. The tubes were first used for toothpaste in 1889 by Johnson & Johnson [WikiTube]. Beforehand, dentifrices were sold as a powder, as a cake, or as a paste in a jar. The jar form was convenient and popular but expensive, and meant that family members would be (unhygienically) scooping paste out of the jar with their individual toothbrushes [MiskellCavProtBizHistRev2004, p37]. Thus the collapsible metal tube seemed like a great invention: cost-effective and hygienic - except the tubes were oftentimes made from lead. Lead seems the most probable metal used for tubes, since it is known that toothpaste tubes were recycled into lead bullets during World War II [SchlosserLeadToothpasteTube2005].
 

The New Zealand Advertising Campaign

The presence of Beechams in New Zealand was light, and largely confined to their advertisements which first started in 1880. Unlike the contemporaneous Beecham adverts published in Britain, there was no graphic element, just typeset text with a dropped capital B, and limited centering. The advert copy would be retained with little change for many years, and highlighted their "Worth a Guinea a Box" slogan. Beecham’s first New Zealand advert, in the Lyttelton Times, illustrated the competitive environment of the day since the advert was sandwiched between other adverts for Lascelles’ Gout and Rheumatic Pills, Norton’s Camomile Pills, Blair’s Gout Pills, Dr King’s Dandelion and Quinine Liver Pills, Kearsley’s Widow Welch’s Female Pills, Keating’s Powder, Keating’s Worm Tablets, Kirkgate’s Pills No. 1, 2 and 3, Paget’s Saline Mixture and Skelton’s Pulmonary Lozenges (wherein the bolded pills treated overlapping complaints) [LytteltonTim1880Sep30P7]:
First Beecham’s advert in New Zealand, Lyttelton Times, 30 September 1880.
Credit: National Library of New Zealand [LytteltonTim1880Sep30P7].

WORTH A GUINEA A BOX.
BEECHAM’S PILLS are admitted by thousands to be worth above a guinea a box for bilious and nervous disorders, such as wind and pain in the stomach, sick headache, giddiness, fulness and swelling after meals, dizziness and drowsiness, cold chills, flushings of heat, loss of appetite, shortness of breath, costiveness, scurvy, blotches on the skin, disturbed sleep, frightful dreams, and all nervous and trembling sensations, &c., &c. The first dose will give relief in twenty minutes. This is no fiction, for they have done it in thousands of cases. Every sufferer is earnestly invited to try one box of these pills, and they will be acknowledged to be
Worth a Guinea a Box.
For a weak stomach, impaired digestion, and all disorders of the liver they act like "magic," and a few doses will be found to work wonders upon the most important organs in the human machine. They strengthen the whole muscular system, restore the long-lost complexion, bring back the keen edge of appetite, and arouse into action with the rosebud of health, the whole physical energy of the human frame. These are Facts, admitted by thousands embracing-all classes of society, and one of the best guarantees to the nervous and debilitated is, Beecham’s Pills have the largest sale of any patent medicine in the world.
BEECHAM’S MAGIC COUGH PILLS.
As a remedy for coughs in general, asthma, difficulty in breathing, shortness of breath, tightness and oppression or the chest, wheezing, &c., these pills stand unrivalled. They speedily remove that sense of oppression and difficulty of breathing which nightly deprive the patient of rest. Let any person give BEECHAM’s COUGH PILLS a trial, and the most violent cough will in a short time be removed.
CAUTION....The public are requested to notice that the words "Beecham’s Pills, St Helen’s," are on the Government Stamp affixed to each box of the Pills; if not on, they are a forgery.
Full directions are given with each box. Sold by all Druggists and Patent Medicine Dealers in the United Kingdom.
Prepared only, and sold Wholesale and Retail, by the Proprietor, T. BEECHAM, Chemist, St Helen’s, in boxes at 1s 1½d and 2s 9d each. Sent post free from the proprietor for 15 or 36 stamps.
Both Beecham’s Pills and Beecham’s Magic Cough Pills are advertised (the toothpaste is introduced later). We see that, even from the beginning, Beecham’s is worried about forgeries.
The initial copy seems to have been a lazy effort since it was not localized for New Zealand at all:
  • "Sold by all Druggists and Patent Medicine Dealers in the United Kingdom."
  • The identity of the "Government" in "...the Government Stamp affixed to each box of the Pills" is unspecified but surely refers to the British government, since it imposed a duty on medicines with payment identified by a stamp duty label (see below) [BasfordCommodityOfGoodNamesBranding1650to1900, ch2, p145-147]
  • The text "Sent post free from the proprietor for 15 or 36 stamps" is also found on adverts in the UK (e.g., for an elaborate example, see The Illustrated London News, 26 February 1887 [IllustratedLonNew1887Feb26]), and it seems improbable that the cost of stamps to deliver a pill box within the UK would also suffice to send the same pill box to the opposite side of the world!
Two examples of medicine stamp duty labels: pre-1885 for Beach & Barnicott (upper) and post-1885 for Zam-Buk (lower) [BasfordCommodityOfGoodNamesBranding1650to1900ch2, p145-147].

Beechams continued with adverts in the Lyttelton Times, initially with a spacing of a few months then more regularly in 1881.
Next they begin advertising in the South Canterbury Times [SouthCanterburyTim1881May03P1], where there is a minor variation in the copy and formatting:
  • The advert now begins "OH YES! OH YES!", which replaces the leading "WORTH A GUINEA A BOX"
  • "WORTH A GUINEA A BOX" remains in the middle of the advert (now followed by "Monmoutshire", for no obvious reason),
  • Greater prominence is assigned to the observation that "Beecham’s Pills | They have the largest sale of any Patent Medicine in the World".
    • Ditto "Let any person give BEECHAM’s COUGH PILLS a trial, and the most violent cough will in a short time be removed."
By July 1882, the advert is shortened, including fixing the "Monmoutshire" typo by excising "Every sufferer is earnestly invited to try one box of these pills, and they will be acknowledged to be Worth a Guinea a Box. Monmoutshire. ... with the rosebud of health, the whole physical energy of the human frame. These are Facts, admitted by thousands embracing-all classes of society, and one of the best guarantees to the nervous and debilitated is ..." In this version, the "Worth a Guinea a Box" slogan is nowhere to be found, although the opening line continues to say "Beecham’s -Pills | Are admitted by thousands to be worth above a Guinea a box" [SouthCanterburyTim1882Jul25P4].
In January 1885, Beechams began advertising in the New Zealand Herald. Their slogan "Worth a Guinea a Box" was back in two places in the advert, which now began "A Wonderful Medicine." The advert can be considered a shortened version of the first Lyttelton Times ad, since it ended after "BEECHAM’S PILLS have the largest sale of any Patent Medicine in the World" (with nothing on the cough pills, forgeries, or stamps sending post free) [NzHerald1885Jan06P3].
First Beecham advert in New Zealand with a graphic element [NzHer1885Jan07P3]. Credit NZME, reproduced for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence.

Almost immediately this was upgraded to a new advert which it contained the first graphic element used by Beecham’s in New Zealand. This was a simple elliptic medallion with "Patent Pills" circumscribed by "Beecham’s * St Helens * Lancashire". The copy in the rest of the advert closely follows the 1880 Lyttelton Times advert [NzHer1885Jan07P3], albeit:
  • Topped by the more modern "A WONDERFUL MEDICINE"
  • With additional text on Beecham’s Pills: "For females of all ages these Pills are invaluable, as a few doses of them carry off all gross humours, open all obstructions, and bring about all that is required. No female should be without them. There is no medicine to be found to equal BEECHAM'S PILLS for removing any obstruction or irregularity of the system. If taken according to the directions given with each box they will soon restore females of all ages to sound and robust health."
  • With additional text on Beecham’s Magic Cough Pills: "... and any one labouring under any of the above complaints need only try One Box to prove that they are the best ever offered to the public for Asthmatic and Consumptive Coughs, Hoarseness, and Oppression of the Chest. ... They give almost instant relief and comfort to those afflicted with the above distressing and, when neglected, dangerous complaints."
  • Localization is mostly addressed via
    • The rewording to "Sold by all Druggists and Patent Medicine Dealers throughout the Colonies",
    • The removal of "Sent post free from the proprietor for 15 or 36 stamps."
  • With an additional closing statement "N.B. - Full directions are given with each box."
A later version italicises "BEECHAM’S PILLS have the Largest Sale of any Patent Medicine in the World." [NzHer1888Aug31P3]
From 1885, a blizzard of Beecham’s adverting begins across many New Zealand newspapers and, for the first time a local, W.W White (a chemist and druggist of Milton), independently advertised their pills [BruceHer1885May05P2]. Other chemists would do the same, in Auckland from 1888 [NzHer1888Sep03P1] and Otago from 1891 [OtagoWit1891Apr16P31].
Returning to 1885, a newly introduced advert for the Otago Daily Times is much more emphatic about the pills being advertised: along with the usual copy on the right hand side of the advert, "BEECHAM’S PILLS." is repeated some forty one times on the left hand side [OtagoDaiTim1885May09P2Supp].
An ornate border and spacer are found in the Beecham’s advert in the Otago Witness in 1887 [OtagoWit1887Oct21P40]. The localisation shifts again, and now reports "Sold by Druggists and Patent Medicine Dealers everywhere", but there are never any endorsements by New Zealanders.
The advertising widened further, to the Auckland Star, Thames Advertiser, Tarankai Herald, Hawke’s Bay Herald, New Zealand Times (Wellington), Colonist (Nelson), Marlborough Express, Grey River Argus, West Coast Times, Tuapeka Times, and the Timaru Herald. There were around 100 ads per month across New Zealand in 1887.
The most ornate newspaper advert in New Zealand by 1887. Credit: National Library of New Zealand [OtagoWit1887Oct21P40].

Influence on New Zealand Culture

One Nelson lady, with poetic leanings and suffering from dyspepsia, versified that she tried Beecham’s Pills but in vain [NelsonEvMai1888Jun02P4].
Australia, like Britain, was a source of fashion/modernity, and so titbits that kept New Zealanders up to date was always of interest. In that vein, there was a passing reference to real estate marketing from Melbourne, with the implicit indication that Beecham’s advertising had broken into popular culture in both Melbourne and the West Coast [WestCoastTim1888Nov01P2]:
This is how they advertise properties for sale in Melbourne : ... If Beecham's pills be worth a guinea a box, what should land be worth a foot at Burwood ? The one - "Like the snowflake on a river, A moment seen, then lost for ever." The other, Burwood ... "A thing of beauty and a joy for ever." That will be fleeting, fugitive, fumacious. ... This will be enduring, immobile, unalterable; therefore, buy some lots at Burwood Township, estate sale on Saturday, 13th October, if only to keep as a momento of your perspicacity and farsightedness. ... Be sure your ancestors will be proud of you and your posterity will bless you and keep the anniversary of your lucky purchase as a red letter day for all time.
A weakly-amusing anecdote can be found in the Marlborough Express in 1891: "A lady recently entered the Masterton Bank, and asked for a box of Beecham’s Pills. It is said that the teller blushed, but offered her a plaster." One infers that the teller believed that the lady needed the pills to help resolve constipation or indigestion or even menstrual difficulties, and the humour lies in the woefully inadequate help that a plaster might provide [MarlboroughExp1891Feb18P3].
One truly New Zealand occasion was when the purgative properties of Beecham’s Pills were (wildly) misused to evade a hangover: "A Feilding gentleman who is not of a bibulous habit took a few extra glasses of ale the other night, and, dreading the after consequences, when he arrived at his home he inconsiderately devoured a whole box of Beecham’s pills ... bar two consumed by another member of his family. Next day he was seriously ill and now he swears he will in future "give the beer a show," no matter what happens." [FeildingStar1893Jan28P2].
 

Other Beecham Mentions in New Zealand

In 1879, Joseph Beecham had a son, Thomas Beecham (who shared the same name as his grandfather, the Beecham’s founder), who went on to be a famous British conductor. Evidently the family was deeply engaged in music since by the time the grandson Thomas Beecham was 10 the company had already published "Beecham’s Portfolio Edition" of popular music and was now publishing their Christmas Annual [MarlboroughExp1889Jan03P2]:
PUBLISHING EXTRAORDINARY.... Perhaps the most marvellous Penny Publication ever produced has just been issued in London, by the well-known proprietor of "Beecham's Pills." It is called "Beecham’s Christmas Annual." Printed on superior paper from new type, and profusely illustrated by capable artists, it contains in its 70 pages contributions by "Ouida," George R. Sims, Jessie Fothergill, Manville Fenn, and a host of other celebrated writers, besides the last tale written by the Hugh Conway, and a quadrille specially arranged from all the popular tunes of the day. A special edition has been issued for Australia and New Zealand. The work, of which the first edition consists of a quarter of million copies, is intended to commence a new departure in penny literature, and well deserves all the success it will undoubtedly secure. Those who know Beecham’s Portfolio Edition of popular music, of which five million copies of various pieces have been distributed gratis mall parts of the world, will be pleased to hear that the enterprising proprietor is now reprinting the first thirty numbers in book form. This unique collection of popular music is published at twopence.
TODO Find an extant copy of either of these publications; a later cover is here.
In an 1889 Christmas supplement published by the Evening Post, there was a short story set in London which makes an interesting point about the affordability of the medicine [EveningPost1899Dec21P2Supp]. The main (ragged) protagonist finds a gold sovereign on the ground and is discussing with his sister what to buy their mother with it, but his sister scorns his suggestions via "’Jacob’s Oil, Beecham’s Pills!’ she ejaculated with contempt. 'You’re a ninny, Jem. Them’s comforts for the rich. What we wants is summit in our insides, and summit to cover us. That’s what we wants. Them diversements (she meant advertisements) are not for the poor ...’"
Beecham’s advertising budget was big, and was recorded as £90,000 globally per annum in 1890 [FieldingStar1890Aug28P2].
Beyond newspapers and works of music, it was all too plausible that they could and would advertise anywhere possible, which leads to two amusing stories, the second of which was published in a British paper as fact.
[DailyTelegraph1891Sep29P2]: For the instruction and edification of the members of the Diocesan Synod, now in session assembled, we publish in another column an article from a Scotch contemporary, entitled, "A New Way of Paying Church Debts." The words of the article ought to sink into the hearts and minds of our readers. There are few churches in New Zealand that are not head over heels in debt, and the ancient methods of extracting money from congregations are very stale and rarely satisfactory. The bazaar, with its stalls of fancy rubbish, baby linen, and suspicious pastry, has long ceased to be the one bright spot ... The bazaar, in fact, has fallen on evil days, and the suggestion of a commercial traveller to our Presbyterian friends in Auld Reekie comes at the nick of time. When a minister has the courage to say that he should feel more assured of his income if his church walls were utilised as advertising hoardings, we may be sure that the days of bazaars are over. They are played out; and henceforth we must not be surprised if the virtues of Beecham’s Pills and Pear’s Soap take the place of Scriptural quotations in our churches.
[Star1890Mar15P3]: ... a certain impecunious Church of England congregation found themselves hard up for hymn books, and it was suggested to the vicar that he might be able to avoid expense if he could get an advertisement of a harmless character inserted into his new stock. After some debate the suggestion was agreed to, and among advertising firms, Beecham’s was the one with which the vicar determined to put himself into communication. His terms were accepted, and the books followed. The vicar and his friends were puzzled to find no advertisement in the books. They came to the conclusion, however, that the pill firm bad done the generous, and sent them a present of the hymnbooks. All went serenely until a Sunday near to Christmas, when the congregation were singing the well known hymn beginning "Hark ! The herald angels sing," when everyone suddenly stopped, and after a lapse of a second or two, a loud titter ran round the assemblage, the cause of which may be guessed when it is stated that the hymn had been printed to begin as follows :...
Hark ! The herald angels sing,
Beecham's pills are just the thing
For easing pain and mothers mild.
Two for adults and one for a child.
Although a good tale, this second story was apparently inaccurate since "Mr Thomas Beecham subsequently contradicted the truth of the story" [Star1890Mar15P3]. Meanwhile a third article - if taken as truth - suggests that church advertising was indeed being entertained in this era [MarlboroughExp1891Oct08P3].
What was valid is that Beechams gave away free sails [EncycloPolBizSmKlBe] and this, as part of a widespread advertising campaign, caused some offense in Sydney that was heard even in Otago: "The beauties of Sydney’s lovely harbour are spoilt by advertisement placards stuck up in every available nook. Even the blue waters themselves are disfigured by an unsightly craft on whose white sails are scrawled the virtues of Beecham's Pills; while the solitudes of the beautiful Hawksbury river are shamed by obnoxious posters stuck prominently on picturesque rocks and fallen trees" [OtagoWit1893Mar30P347].
Although later we shall see a different characterisation, the pills themselves were once described as "nasty squirmy things" in a further amusing anecdote that reached New Zealand [EveningStar1891Apr29P3]:
A good story is told of an American heiress named Miss Lighter and the late Lord Beauchamp. The name of the nobleman is pronounced Beecham.
"Say, my lord, I guess you can spend pretty much what you please on your fancies," quoth the heiress.
"Well," replied His Lordship, "I would hardly say that. A man in my position has so many embargoes on his income that in these days of agricultural depression his stock of pocket money is often microscopical."
"My! but surely a few more columns of advertisements are always bound to bring in another 'hundred thousand’?" ... (The lady counted in dollars.)
"I...l...hardly understand, advertise! What should I advertise...my poverty ?"
"Poverty, no, your pills ! Ain't you Beecham's pills?"
"No. I rather wish I were."
"My word! and to think I've been taking those nasty squirmy things all my days, in preference to my own uncle’s article, simply because I thought a lord sold them! Weren't you made a lord for your success in the pill business?"
"No," replied the nobleman pensively; "it is only the brewers who are made lords, not those who manufacture the correctives of their beer. I am a lord by inheritance."
All Beecham’s advertising had one unintended consequence: "About 3000 begging letters are received by the proprietor of Beecham's pills annually. ... Quite enough. More are not desired" [BruceHer1892Jan22P5].

The advertising in Britain was richer than in New Zealand; the ads included large-format engravings of men (and women) such as this advertisement in a Christmas 1888 issue of the Illustrated London News.

With that background, we read "Henry Irving tells a story with great gusto about a little girl. Mr Irving was taking a holiday in a village in Dorset last summer when he came across a number of children coming out of school. One little girl stood and looked me in the face, as though she had seen me before. After a time Irving said : 'Well little girl, do you know who I am?’ 'Yes, sir,' was the reply; 'you are one of Beecham’s pills’. The little girl had seen his face in an advertisement" [WestCoastTim1892Jun23P2].
 

Toothpaste

Beecham’s toothpaste was first advertised in New Zealand in January 1893 as the third Beecham product after Beecham’s Pills and Beecham’s Magic Cough Pills, via "Beecham’s Tooth Paste, Cleanses the teeth, Perfumes the Breath. In Collapsible Tubes : 1s each" [OtagoWitJan12P48].
First advert describing Beecham’s Tooth Paste in detail, Otago Witness, 20 April 1893. Credit: National Library of New Zealand [OtagoWit1893Apr20P52]

In April, more description is provided: "BEECHAM’S TOOTHPASTE Will recommend itself ; it is efficacious, economical, cleanses the teeth, perfumes the breath, removes tartar, and prevents decay. It is composed of the best known ingredients for neutralising the acids of the mouth, preventing all deleterious deposits upon the teeth, and is a pleasant and reliable dentifrice BEECHAM’S TOOTH PASTE is put up in collapsible tubes, perfectly air-tight, and so adjustable that no waste need occur ; the packages are pretty for the toilet table, and most convenient for the travelling bag. Of all Druggists, or from the Proprietor, for ONE SHILLING, postage paid." [OtagoWit1893Apr20P52]
 

Stamps and Telegrams

With this history, we see that the messages on Beecham’s underprint stamps were perfectly or very closely tied to their newspaper stamps. Others went further, and indeed one pun crept in ("Stamp Beecham’s Pills on your mind.").
Verbatim Message
Beecham’s Pills for constipation.
Beecham’s Pills for sick headache.
Beecham’s Pills stand unrivalled.
Beecham’s Pills Worth a guinea a box.
Beecham’s Tooth Paste, in tubes 1/-
Reworded Message
Beecham’s Pills for disordered liver.
Beecham’s Pills for female complaints.
Beecham’s Pills for impaired digestion.
Beecham’s Pills for nervous ills.
Beecham’s Pills invigorate the nerves.
Beecham’s Pills restore appetite.
Beecham’s Pills The world’s medicine.
New Message
Beecham’s Cough Pills for chest affections
Beecham’s Pills Best family medicine
Beecham’s Pills Great colonial demand.
Beecham’s Pills purify the blood.
Beecham’s Pills The leading remedy.
Beecham’s Pills The premier medicine.
Stamp Beecham’s Pills on your mind.
 
More ornate adverts were also added to telegram forms, which received some criticism during a review of the Budget by former premier and Postmaster-General Sir John Hall [OtagoDaiTim1893Jul13P3] [WikiJohnHall]:
Sir John Hall made many excellent points in his criticism of the Budget. The Colonial Treasurer, he said, is personally popular, and the very fault we have to find with him personally is that he keeps bad company. "I will lastly," said Sir John, "deal with the attack of the Premier upon my late friend Sir H. Atkinson." Sir John waxed humorous over the misuse of State documents for advertising purposes, and the endorsement upon telegrams that "Beecham’s pills were worth a guinea a box." "It is not non-borrowing, it is all borrowing." Reciting many of the titles of the minor subjects of the Budget, Sir John said they would be shunted, and it might be said the policy of the Government was one of shunt."
In an 1893 letter to the editor, "C." speaks against what today we would call globalisation, and specifically how New Zealand pharmacists now act as distributors of overseas patent medicines rather than preparing the medicines themselves. In passing the commentator notes that 6 million boxes of Beecham’s Pills are sold per annum and - rare amongst patent medicines - Beecham’s Pills were actually patented [AucklandStar1893Feb21P2].
The name Beecham came up peripherally in regards to an 1891 controversy over a certain Italian nobleman, Count Mattei, who claimed his remedies were curing cancer [OtagoWit1891Mar26P35]. In a related opinion piece on the Mattei remedies, the author argues that public opinion on their value (efficacy) - like the value of "Beecham’s Pills, Holloway’s ointment, or any other of the countless patent preparations for every conceivable purpose" - should be determined from an experimental inquiry judged by competent observers rather than the "instinctive attraction towards the mysterious" [OtagoWit1894Feb01P27].
 

The 1894 Counterfeit Episode

Given the low cost of ingredients, Beecham was right to fear counterfeits, eve on the far side of the world from Britain. In 1894 "at the Police Court to-day, before Mr Carew, S.M., William Edward Hanlon, of Dunedin, was charged with selling boxes of pills to which a false trade description within the meaning of the Patents, Designs, and Trades Mark Act of 1889...to wit, the words "Beecham's Pills" and "Beecham’s Patent Pills, St. Helens, Lancashire"... were applied, contrary to section 89 of the statute. There were three informations - one alleging the sale of twenty-four dozen boxes of these pills to John Peterson, the second twenty-two dozen to David Guthrie Shepherd, and the third twenty dozen to Robert Rutherford. MrHaggitt, who conducted the prosecution, suggested that defendant be informed that he might be tried by indictment if he so chose. Mr Solomou said that defendant pleaded guilty and would elect to be dealt with summarily. ... This business had been carried on for some considerable time." [EveningStar1894Jul05P2]
In Hanlon’s defence, his lawyer reported Hanlon had bought the pills in the belief they were genuine from an Edwin Peterson, who had passed through New Zealand and while there represented himself to Hanlon as an agent for chemists’ sundries. However, the judge did not find Hanlon’s naivet鍊to be credible.
Reporting of the case surfaced various nuggets [EveningStar1894Jul05P2]:
  • Hanlon’s lawyer, Mr Solomon, was evidently not a fan of Beecham’s Pills, since he interjected "And [Beecham] propagated throughout the world the solemn untruth that they are worth a guinea a box ..."
  • "The [Beecham] trademark was registered in New Zealand in 1886"
  • "... the genuine [Beecham’s] pills were as round as shot, and all of exactly the same size ... and so hard that they would fly from the edge of a sharp knife"
  • "The result of this imitation business was that Mr Beecham had been getting little or no profit from the sale of his pills here for the past two years"
  • The imitation pills were not good - soft and "contained a considerable amount of bitter aloe, and there was none of that in Beecham’s"
More of the backstory is reported in [TuapekaTim1894Jul14P3], wherein we learn that Beecham’s sent an anti-fraud agent to New Zealand. Since there is no record of a local Beecham agent or Beecham family member in New Zealand beforehand, it is possible that this is the first instance of a Beecham’s representative reaching New Zealand. "It seems that for the past year or more Beecham, of pill-making fame, had found that the returns from the sale of his pills in New Zealand had been unaccountably falling off, and he determined to ascertain the cause. Accordingly one of his agents, one of a specially trained staff whose business it is to ferret out and hunt down all cases of infringement on the rights of the renowned and wealthy pill-maker, after a month or two in Dunedin, discovered that pills were being locally made in large quantities and sold to retail dealers as Beecham’s pills, and by them palmed off on to the public. Forged wrappers were placed on the boxes in which they were sold, and as the retail people got them for 3s 6d a dozen less than they paid for the genuine Beecham article, and the public were easily imposed on, the local artists did a roaring trade. During the hearing of the case, it was incidentally stated that Beecham, in advertising his pills, had for many years past expended £110,000 a-year [in advertising]."
Further details on the case can be found in the following references: [OamaruMail1894Aug07P4] [OtagoWit1894Aug09P27] [TuapekaTim1894Aug15P2]. The middle reference reports "There is a changing fashion in pills as in other things. At one time it was Morrison’s Pills ..., then Holloway’s, then Cockle’s, and now Beecham’s." Morrison’s and Cockle’s Pills were advertised in New Zealand as far back as 1849 [NzSpecCookStrGuard1849Oct06P2]. These pills generally contained aloe as their active ingredient, from:
  • The ingredients of Morrison’s Pills are not easily discerned, in part because New Zealand advertising (and sales?) ended around 1873, well before New Zealand’s pioneering 1904/1905 patent medicine ingredient disclosure regulation came into effect [NzHerald1905Jan04P3Supp][TuapekaTim1905May13P2].
  • [AucklandStar1894Feb03P4Supp] reports "... the active ingredient [in Beecham’s Pills] being, as in Holloway, Sequah and Mother Siegel, that cheap and efficient purgative, aloes". TODO Ascertain other ingredients in these pills.
  • Cockle’s Pills contained aloes, colocynth and rhubarb [OtagoDaiTim1905May12P4].
 

Epilogue

The Beecham’s business narrowed but never really stopped. The message was simplified in 1895 [NzHerald1895Sep03P3].
The firm’s last advert for Beecham’s Magic Cough Pills was in August 1899 [PateaMai1899Aug14P1] (and 1907 in Great Britain [Middlesex&SurreyExp1902Aug20P1], [JerseyIndAndDaiTele1907Apr297P3]), although there was stock in New Zealand sales until 1932 [NzHerald193218P29Supp].
There was an (apparently) independent endorsement of Beecham’s toothpaste in 1899 [NzHerald1899Nov29P3]
HOW TO BE BEAUTIFUL. When the face is very heated it should never be washed in cold water. You should use warm water and then tepid water, and dry slowly on a soft towel, and powder. Leave the powder on for a few minutes and then brush off entirely.
The only way to keep the teeth in perfect order is to brush them twice or three times a day. You should use tepid water in preference to cold. Beecham’s tooth paste will be found to be of great use in removing the tartar.
Where people are apt to be sleepless at night, an excellent plan is to read a very dull book before going to bed, and to drink a little hot milk and eat a biscuit before going to sleep ; the window must also be left open all night.
When the hair is apt to fall out, especially after any illness, this is a good tonic to use: Sulphate of quinine, 10 grains; bay rum, two drachms; tincture of cantharides, two drachma; glycerine, four drachma; water to six ounces. Rub this well into the head every night till the hair has ceased to fall.
Next Beecham’s tooth paste bit the dust, since its last New Zealand advert was at the end of 1903 [NazHerald1903Dec30P3Supp] (the end of 1904 in Great Britain [UlsterEcho1904Nov11P1]). New Zealanders then had the option of "Euthymol Tooth Paste" and "Cherry Tooth Paste" [LytteltonTim1904Jan07P2], "Wilkinson’s Carbolized Tooth Paste" [EveningStar1904Jan25P5] and so forth. From now on, Beecham’s Pills were the focus focusing of the firm’s advertising campaigns.
In 1907, the founder Thomas Beecham died aged 86 [WangHer1907May27P5], and left around £87 thousand in his will [WikiThomasBeecham].
Thomas’ son Joseph died in 1916 aged 68 [NzTim1916Oct25P8]. As testimony to his business prowess, his estate was valued at a much larger £1.5 million. The business passed to his two sons, Henry Beecham and Thomas Beecham, but was managed by Joseph’s younger brother (another Henry Beecham) and three executors for three years. In 1919 the pill business was sold to financier Philip Hill who kept the name (and indeed incorporated the company as Beecham’s Pills) but the era of the family firm had passed [LetLookAgainBeecham] [RefForBizGlaxSmKl].
The New Zealand price of 56 pills remained at 1s 1½d even into the 1923 or so [NzHerald1923Dec15P16].
Around the same time, the text-dominated adverts extended to include portraiture in some New Zealand publications, such as this winking woman [OtagoWit1924Jul01P13].
 
First advert with a pictorial element, Otago Witness, 23 September 1924. Credit: National Library of New Zealand [OtagoWit1924Sep23P19]

Philip Hill established a laboratory to extend his product line and as well acquired other health related companies. Perhaps recognising that Beecham’s Cough Pills filled a need, his first pharmaceutical product was an aspirin-based cold and flu powder that was introduced in 1926 then he acquired a cough syrup company in 1928.
Meanwhile there was a lot of innovation in toothpastes, containing active ingredients with actual dental efficacy. One such company was Macleans, founded by New Zealand born Alex C. Maclean in 1919, who initially manufactured "own-name" products for pharmacists. In 1927 he created Macleans Peroxide Toothpaste, the very first whitening toothpaste. Filling a 25 year product gap, Macleans was purchased by Hill in 1938 [GskBuildBrd] [LifeAngloAmBr] [RefForBizGlaxSmKl].
The slogan "Worth A Guinea A Box" was finally retired in New Zealand in 1953 [Press1953Mar25P4].
Manufacturing of Beecham’s Pills themselves remained a constant until 1998, even as the pill business continued to change hands: Beecham’s Patent Pills., Beecham Estates and Pills, Beecham Pills Limited, Beecham Pharmaceuticals Limited, Beecham Health Care, then SmithKline Beecham [WikiBeechamsPills].
Later SmithKline merged with Glaxo and formed GlaxoSmithKline where - in a further example of how connected the world is - Glaxo traces its beginnings to New Zealand in the 1870s [RefForBizGlaxSmKl].

Friday, October 8, 2021

Waterproofs by B. Birnbaum & Son

Waterproofs

Ask for Patent Odourless Waterproofs, Made in W’lgton.
These underprints advertised “Pear Tree” brand waterproof clothing that was manufactured and distributed by B. Birnbaum & Son Ltd., a British company with branches in New York, Melbourne and Wellington. As well as being a surname, Birnbaum is German for pear tree; and so the pear tree and bee (for the founder’s initial) were used in their advertising.
 

Invention of the Waterproof (Raincoat)

The pioneer of waterproof fabric was Scotsman chemist Charles Macintosh, who sold his first Mackintosh raincoat in 1824 after patenting it a year earlier. Two layers of fabric sandwiched a solution of rubber dissolved in naphtha (“liquid rubber”) and the layers were pressed together. The naphtha was obtained from distilling coal-tar. This first generation of products had some teething problems though: smelly, too stiff in cold weather and too sticky in hot weather [WikiMac].
Natural rubber, as initially extracted from suitable trees, was sometimes called caoutchouc. This consists of approximately 95% latex and 5% impurities (other organic compounds). The latex is a polymer of isoprene, with structure [WikiIsoPr] [WikiPolyIsoPr]:

... which polymerises to ...
Natural rubber is found in many plants, such as the “milk” of dandelions, where it is produced as a defense against herbivorous insects. Latex should not be confused with plant sap; latex is a distinct substance and made separately by specialized laticifer cells [WikiNatRub] [WikiLatex] [WikiLacif].
Rubber was introduced to Europe in 1744 as a product of the Pará rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) found in the Amazon rainforest. During much of the nineteenth century that tree continued to be the main source of natural rubber. The tree was not grown successfully outside Brazil until the 1870s, when (after a first failed attempt) 70,000 seeds were smuggled to Kew Gardens in 1875, some 2400 were coaxed to germinate, and then seedlings were sent to India, Sri Lanka, Indonesia and Malaysia to start plantations [WikiHeveaBrasil]. At the same time the rubber bush (Ficus elastica) is another rich source of rubber, and its natural range extends from Nepal, through Bhutan, northeastern India, Burma, Yunnan (in China) and Malaysia to Indonesia [WikiFicusEl], and this likely explains the alternative name Indiarubber.
Gutta-percha is chemically similar to natural rubber, being also a polymer of isoprene, but with E stereochemistry instead of natural rubber’s Z stereochemistry [ChemDienePolymers]. Gutta-percha was harvested from Palaquium gutta trees found in Malaysia. It found use in insulating underground telegraph cables, furniture, golf balls, jewelry, pistol hand grips, rifle shoulder pads, walking sticks, dental fillings and the like, but there no mention of gutta-percha clothing [WikiGuttaPercha] [EndoGuttaHist].
In 1839 Charles Goodyear (of tyres fame) invented vulcanisation which increases the rigidity and durability of rubber by forming cross-links between sections of the polymer chains. Goodyear’s process involved heating the rubber with sulphur (and then the cross-links are chains of sulphur atoms); and by 1843 it was applied to waterproof clothing too [WikiVulc] [WikiMac]. 
A representative diagram of sulphur cross links (black) connecting poly-isoprene chains (red and blue) by displacing hydrogen atoms (and – apparently – some carbon atoms within the chain too) [WikiVulcChem]

 

Bernard Birnbaum and the Birnbaums

Bernard Birnbaum was born around 1830-1832 in the Russian-controlled section of Poland, which he left when aged 18 [EastLondonObs1911Aug26P5]. Poland had been a nation state since the tenth century but, by the nineteenth century, was carved up between Prussia, the Habsburg Empire and Russia, where Russia had the lion’s share [WikiPolMid] [WikiPol1795-1918]. Bernard Birnbaum, as a Jew, was subject to double taxation and also liable to serve in the military, where he might have been forced to convert [WikiPol19thCentJew]. We can hypothesise these constraints drove him to emigrate.
Not too much later (i.e. nearly half a century before 1894), B. Birnbaum started a business manufacturing waterproof clothing. Reportedly he started in Spitalfields, London [SpitalHackneyWick], the firm was connected to 21, 22 and 23 New Broad-street during the 1870s [Ancestry, London City Directories] [SydneyMornHer1879Nov24P3], Dace St in 1885 [Ancestry, London City Directories], and nearby Wick Lane, Bow, London by the end of the 1890s [WairarapaDaiTim1894Aug10P3]. At that point the firm was known as B. Birnbaum and Son.
In this narrative, J.B. Birnbaum and Isidore B. Birnbaum will prove to be particularly important; yet J.B. Birnbaum will be peculiarly elusive. For now let us record that in London in the second half of the nineteenth century there were several Birnbaum families [Ancestry, England census]:
  • Joseph (born around 1821) was married to Lewis (1830), with children Lewis (1855), Wilhelmina (1858) and Frank (1860).
    • In 1861, Joseph was recorded as a musician rather than a manufacturer, and with origins in Hungary rather than Poland.
  • Isaac (1829) was married to Nessa (1832), with children Bernard (1857), Moses (1863) and Rebecca (1868).
    • In 1871, Isaac was recorded as a manager at a waterproof factory, with origins in Poland, so it seems most likely that he was part of the extended family of Bernard Birnbaum and worked in Bernard’s firm.
  • The founder Bernard (1830-1832) was married to Rebecca (1838-1839) and ultimately they had six sons and six daughters, namely Henry (1862-1863), Priscilla (1864), Theodore (1865), Rudolph (1867-1868), Jenette or Ilinia (1868-1869), Gertrude (1869-1870), Isidore (and sometimes found as Isadore or Isidor) (1870-1871), Albert (28 October 1871), Eve or Eva (1873), May or Mary (1874-1875), Kate or Katy (1876), and Sidney (1878). Rebecca seems to have been an impressive mother, both in her fecundity and that all her twelve children survived. The variety of names arises from the variegated spelling in the source documents (most especially the 1871 and 1881 English census). The birth dates are calculated from the year of each record minus the listed age, which leads to some ambiguity as indicated.
    • The eldest son Henry is denoted as a clerk in the 1881 census, is not recorded in the census in 1891 (travelling?) and in 1901 he is Director and Manager of India Rubber works. Most likely Henry is the “Son” in “B. Birnbaum and Son”
    • Theodore and Rudolph were both identified as managers of the factory in the 1891 census, and Theodore seems to have been granted a patent with an 1896 priority date [UniPatent189609622A]
    • Isidore first appears as a 4 month old baby in the 1871 census but is not living with the family in the 1881 census (he seems to be at boarding school) nor in the 1891 census (travelling?). Unlike his younger brother, Albert, who was an Oxford man, Isidore seems to have more of a mechanical bent.
  • Eugene J.W.P. Birnbaum (1849) was married to Maria, with children Amy (1874), Caroline (1875), Charles (1880), Henry (1882), Alexander (1883), Louisa (1884), Helena (1886), Paulina (1887) and Joseph (1889)
    • Eugene was a hawk-stall (sp?) keeper and Maria performed plain needlework in 1891.
  • John Birnbaum (1862) was a labourer at a sugar factor in 1881
  • Adolf Birnbaum resided in Cripplegate in 1866
  • James Birnbaum was on the electoral register in 1893 and onwards, at South St, St Luke, London (but we have no other details)
Thus, for the elusive J.B. Birnbaum, we find a few J. Birnbaums, but most seem to be very unlikely candidates. Only James Birnbaum seems possible, yet almost nothing is known about him beyond his connection to St Luke, London. Outside of Australasia during the time of interest, the site [Ancestry] has no records of another J. Birnbaum with a connection to Britain nor, outside of the USA, a J.B. Birnbaum alive in 1892-1893. Perhaps J.B. Birnbaum was a nom de plume (!?) or J.B. Birnbaum spent his formative years outside the Anglophone world, such as Poland or thereabouts?
 

The British Operations of Bernard Birnbaum

In the words of the firm, their success was built on sustained innovation, since “the proprietors recognised at once that something better was required than the unhealthy and evil smelling articles which were for years known by the name of macintoshes, so named after the Scotchman who first patented the invention of making cloths impervious to moisture. Every year saw an improvement in the goods turned out by the firm until to-day Messrs Birnbaum’s goods have no equal in the world” [WairarapaDaiTim1894Aug10P3].
In 1879, a reporter relays their manufacturing process as follows [SydneyMornHer1879Nov24P3]: “The raw caoutchouc (which as most of our readers are doubtless aware, is obtained principally from the acrid and tenacious juice extracted from certain species of trees growing in the East Indies and South America) is represented in rough balls and rolls, which are quite “springy” but have anything but an attractive appearance. By the application of a powerful solvent, such as bisulphuret of carbon, naptha, crude petroleum, benzol, and the essential oils of turpentine, lavender, and sassafras, the raw caoutchouc is rendered soluble, and, in the hands of manufacturers, such as Mr. Birnbaum, is turned to valuable account in the preparation of water-proof clothing and a thousand other articles, small and large, that enter into daily use in civilized communities. In the preparation of water-proof clothing the caoutchouc is very thinly spread over the cloth, while the latter is being passed over hot rollers, and this process is repeated until a sufficiently thick and perfectly even coating is obtained, which renders the cloth thoroughly water-proof. This is what is called “single waterproof,” or “single fabric.” To make “double waterproof” goods two pieces of cloth, treated in the manner just described, are laid together, with the caoutchouc-covered sides face to face, and are then passed, between rollers, when they unite so thoroughly as to become one piece of cloth. The process of vulcanization is, however, first resorted to, and therein really lies the commercial success of the use of what is usually called indiarubber. For the purposes of vulcanisation, sulphur and caoutchouc are mixed, and submitted to a heat of 800°F., when the two ingredients unite and form a substance which acids or alkalies will hardly affect, which the usual solvents such as naptha, turpentine, or bi-sulphide of carbon came to render soluble, and which remains thoroughly elastic under the influence of any climatic temperature.”
The article goes on to say that “Mr. Birnbaum's show-case [at the Sydney International Exhibition] contains a great number of articles illustrating the use to which this valuable material is  put, such as coats, leggings, Inverness capes, ladies’ capes, circular capes, driving capes, bags, satchels, strops, knee-wrappers, or gig aprons, horse loin covers, helmets, ladies' aprons, &c. The gentlemen’s coats and ladies’ capes have an exceedingly neat appearance, being lined on the inside with some thin material, while the outside' is made up of the ordinary fabrics, such as Indian cloth, twill, silk, &c. These articles are light, well made, very flexible, and comfortable to wear, and thoroughly waterproof. All the other goods are equally well made and serviceable, and after a glance at the contents of this show-case, we can easily understand the rapid increase which has taken place in the use of caoutchouc in the manufacture of articles of all kinds where elasticity or waterproof qualities are requisite. Forty years ago the amount of raw caoutchouc imported into Great Britain did not exceed four or five hundred-weight, and now the importation has increased to the extent of several thousands of tons.” [SydneyMornHer1879Nov24P3]
B. Birnbaum and Son was a regular exhibitor at international exhibitions, and likely this was a pillar of their marketing strategy when entering new markets. The firm won gold medals for their waterproofs in Vienna (Vienna World's Fair, 1873), Santiago (Chilean International Exhibition, 1875), Paris (Exposition Universelle, 1878), Sydney (Sydney International Exhibition, 1879 [SouthAustaliaRegister1879Oct02P6]), Melbourne (Melbourne Centennial International Exhibition, 1888), Paris (Exposition Universelle, 1889) and in Dunedin (New Zealand and South Seas Exhibition, 1890).
Over 1886-1889, the firm built their Wick Lane Rubber Works on Smeed Rd. Here balls of raw rubber, perhaps transported by canal to Old Ford Lock and then hand-carted to the back of works, was processed into a solution of dissolved latex and spread on fabric. Reportedly this building is London’s and possibly England’s only surviving nineteenth century rubber works. The fabric was turned into waterproof clothing at the adjacent four-storey factory, on the corner of Smeed and Dace Roads [SpitalHackneyWick].
1909 map of Hackney Wick. Birnbaum’s premises are marked as India Rubber Works east of the “W” in the North London Railway. The uncoloured constriction of Hackney Cut east of the India Rubber Works is Old Ford Lock. Credit [AbebooksBacon1909].


 
Left to right: views of the waterproof clothing factory from Smeed Rd, corner of Smeed and Dace Rds, and Dace Rd [SpitalHackneyWick]. 
By 1894 the firm employed over 1000 hands in its London factory and 150 in Melbourne, in addition to its other numerous branches and agencies [WairarapaDaiTim1894Aug10P3].
 

New Zealand Presence

Waterproofs had been imported into New Zealand by 1853 [NzSpecAndCookStrGuard1853Apr20P2], but it was not until 1889-1890 that Birnbaum-branded waterproofs were heard from, where they are exhibitors at the New Zealand and South Seas Exhibition, a world’s fair held in Dunedin from November 1889 to April 1890 [WikiNzSSExh1889]. Local waterproofs included products by Hallenstein Bros. and Co. and Zealandia Waterproof Company, but it was Birnbaum’s clothing that received the most first class awards [EveningStar1890Feb19] and it was his firm’s items – including a “beautiful waterproof carriage” – that “attracted so much attention” [OtagDaiTim1890Apr26P2].
Evening Star, 19 February 1890, P4.
Credit: Allied Press Ltd., subject to a 
Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence  [EveningStar1890Feb19].
 
After the exhibition closed, the products on display (“Men's Waterproof Coats, Ladies’ Silk Waterproof Cloaks, Ladies’ Heavy Waterproof Cloaks, Men’s Fishing Stockings, Leggings, [that] Beautiful Waterproof Carriage, Rugs, &c”) were sold off at the “D.I.C.”  [OtagDaiTim1890Apr26P2]. The D.I.C. was the Drapery and General Importing Company of New Zealand Ltd, a New Zealand chain of department stores that started in Dunedin in 1884 on the corner of The Octagon and Princes Street, and finally closed its doors in 1991 [WikiDIC].
Map of Wellington in 1887 showing Cornhill Lane and Victoria St [NatLibNzTeAroReclaimedLand]. The “upwards” leg of the historic Victoria St is now named Wakefield, St, and instead the historic Farish St has become an extension of the modern Victoria St [GoogleMapsTeAro].

 
Nothing more was heard of from B. Birnbaum and Son in New Zealand until 1892, when we learn that the firm were hiring girls and machinists for coats at Cornhill-street in Wellington. This is a small lane connecting the end of Old Custom House St to Manners St. The work was assisted by “water power” [EveningPost1892Feb29P3]. Almost immediately a boy was needed [EveningPost18920303P3], a telephone line was installed [EveningPost18920311P2] and then they sought an experienced mantle machinist. Their new telephone number was 714 [NzTim1892Mar22P3].
This site was always intended to be a factory, not a showroom for imports; and accordingly formal approval for this purpose was obtained [EveningPost1892Mar04P4]. Although it seems that it would have been easier for the firm to simply import its finished products to New Zealand directly from Britain or Melbourne, there is a mix of potential overt and covert reasons for local manufacturing:
  • At the time, New Zealand imposed import tariffs on finished goods but not raw materials, so local manufacture enabled them to reduce their prices “The firm manufactures almost entirely in the Colony for local consumption, thereby reducing the cost to the buyer by the amount of duty payable on the articles imported, as the raw material comes in duty free” [WairarapaDaiTim1894Aug10P3]
  • B. Birnbaum and Son might expect greater sales by having a local connection. This is strongly suggested in [EveningPost1896Sep22P4]
  • B. Birnbaum had six sons and perhaps he sought to provide them with individualized opportunities to develop skills and experience
  • Presumably shipping costs could be lowered by transporting the raw material directly from Asia / South America to New Zealand and avoiding the extra leg to Britain (but this potential reason is severely weakened by the existence of their Melbourne operation).
The tariff on waterproofs in 1893 is hard to determine exactly, but does not appear to be especially high. Depending on the imported item, tariffs were charged by weight, volume, or by the value of the item (the latter is known as an ad valorem tariff). For instance an 1863 report by the Mr. Wood, Colonial Treasurer of New Zealand, reports “We all know what the duty is upon spirits, wine, sugar and tea, and on all articles paying a fixed [ad valorem] duty; but duty is levied upon a variety of articles at 4s. per cubic foot, and upon others at 3s. per hundredweight; and it is not so easy to ascertain the [effective] ad valorem rate upon these. I have never yet seen any statement exhibiting the per-centage that is paid upon the value of these imports, and very exaggerated notions are abroad of the amount of taxation paid by the people of this Colony. Now, Sir, the duty which is paid upon spades and shovels is 2¼ percent, ad valorem : total value imported during the last six months being £12,785, and the duty upon them £294, 1s. 7d. Upon boots and shoes, which were imported to the value of £96,489, the duty levied was £5,368 or a per-centage of 5½. Upon candles the duty amounted to 2½ per cent.; upon cotton goods, 5½ per cent. (hear, hear) ; upon silk, 3-1/3 percent.; upon slop clothing, 6¼ per cent, (hear, hear); upon woollen clothing 6-1/3 per cent.; and upon other goods of a similar description, 6¾ per cent. (Hear, hear.) … Upon dried fruits. An article of great luxury I should say, the duty comes to 17 and 1-10th per cent.; … With the exception of some few articles, which may be classed as those of considerable luxury, consumed only by persons who can very well afford it, I consider that the amount of duty which is levied under this tariff does not press hardly upon the people of the Colony.”
Waterproofs are arguably similar to woolen clothing, so the 1863 duty was presumably charged 4/- per cubic foot and in the neighborhood of 6¾% ad valorem [AJHR1864, A1, P11], then increased by 1/- per cubic foot in 1864 [AJHR1864, B1A, P6] to reach circa 8½% ad valorem. In 1878, there were sweeping tariff changes proposed [AJHR1879, B2A,P17] and adopted [AJHR1878, B2, P58] [CustTarifNz1980, P225], but the largest changes were to the ad valorem tariff, to arrest the loss of revenue due to importers that lowballed the value of their imported goods in order to reduce the tariff paid, and changes were not made to the volumetric tariff.
In fact, in the same year, it is possible that the tariffs for non-clothing waterproofs were actually lowered, to zero. Certainly it is recorded that the total annual tariff revenue from “Gutta Percha Manufactures, not being Wearing Apparel, and not otherwise enumerated” amounted to just £45, and it was proposed that these items be struck out of the tariff. Given the similarity of gutta-percha to natural latex and the peculiar reference to clothing (for which gutta percha was not used), this £45 could relate to other waterproof items made from vulcanized natural rubber such as “bags, satchels, strops, knee-wrappers, or gig aprons, horse loin covers, helmets, … &c” [SydneyMornHer1879Nov24P3] [AJHR1878, B2, P58].
Still, even if a tariff of 5/- per cubic foot averaged out to around 8.5% ad valorem, that seems a relatively minor cost compared to the effort of starting a new business on the far side of the world. It suggests that some of the other reasons were at play!
 

Business Travel before the Birnbaums

Since the Cornhill factory was secured and employees were hired before there is any (discernible) record of a Birnbaum family member either reaching New Zealand or traveling internally within New Zealand, then presumably the local business was started by a senior manager not part of the Birnbaum family.
An intriguing candidate is Joseph Gee, who visited New Zealand regularly in the 1890s and was later described as “Resident partner in the Melbourne branch of the English firm of B. Birnhaum, and Sons (Limited), London” [EveningPost1895Jan22P2]. From emigration records, several Joseph Gee’s sailed to Australia and New Zealand at different times (including a cook), but a standout itinerary is when a Joseph Gee (aged 25) embarked from the Melbourne, the site of Birnbaum’s Australian factory, for New Zealand on 11 November 1891 [VicArcGee1891] on the ss Tekapo and reached Dunedin at 19 November [OtagoDaiTim1891Nov19P1]. 
There were many Gee’s living in New Zealand at the time, and the shipping records typically only record the surname, but it is plausible that the following travels show Gee scoping the principal cities of New Zealand for a base, visiting family in Auckland over Christmas in 1891, then setting up an establishment in Wellington. Or there could have been multiple Gee’s steaming between cities, some – or all – of whom were not working for Birnbaum at the time.
After apparently inspecting Dunedin for several days, he  plausibly took the train to Christchurch where “Joseph Gee of Melbourne” stayed at the (higher-end) Coker’s Hotel, “three minutes walk from the Christchurch railway station”, over 24-27 November 1891 in order to scope out Christchurch (and Lyttelton) [Press1891Nov24P4Press1891Nov27P4] [CantStorCokers].
Next there is a trip by a “Gee” on the ss Omapere that reached Wellington “from South” on 1 December [NzTim1891Dec02P2]. After two weeks there (presumably conducting more due diligence), a “Gee” sails on the Mararaoa from Wellington on 16 December up the east coast to Auckland (with ultimate destination Sydney) [Press1891Dec17P4]. Given that two “Misses Gee” travelled by themselves from Auckland to Christchurch (via Wellington) then back to Wellington over January and February 1892 [OtagoDaiTim1892Jan29P1] [Press1892Feb02P4] [LytteltonTim1892Feb10P4] [NzzMail1892Feb12P29], it seems possible that there were members of the extended Gee family already living in Auckland, and this “Gee” spent his Christmas there with them, as well as scouting out Auckland.
Next, on 18 January 1892 a “J. A. Gee” leaves Auckland “for the south” (i.e., New Plymouth, Wellington and Lyttelton) by the ss Takapuna. Given that no “Gee” disembarked at New Plymouth or Lyttelton, it seems most likely that J. A. Gee’s journey ended at Wellington, where he could begin setting up business [NzHer1892Jan16P1] [TarankiHer1892Jan19P2] [OtagoDaiTim1892Jan19P1] [LytteltonTim1892Jan22P4].  
At the same time it must be acknowledged that there are other Gee travels that do not fit into this explanation, but might hint at an extended Gee family with prior connections to Wellington:
  • There were two Messers Gee who reached Lyttelton from Wellington (or possibly Westport) on 24 November 1891 [Press1891Nov24P4] [LytteltonTim1891Nov24P4]. Similarly, there were two reported sailings by “Gee” for Wellington on 26 November 1891 (ss Takapuna and ss Waihora), albeit only one recorded arrival in Wellington on 27 November (ss Takapuna) [Press1891Nov27P4] [NzTim1891Nov28P2].
  • A “Gee” reached Lyttelton from Wellington on 28 November on the ss Rotorua [Star1891Nov28P3].
  • There was also a “Gee” who departed Lyttelton on January 21 for Wellington on the ss Tekapo [Press1892Jan22P4].
 

Birnbaums and Their Cornhill St Factory in New Zealand

The first record of immigration to New Zealand or internal travel within the country by a Birnbaum the family is when a Mr J. Birnbaum travelled from Dunedin for Christchurch on 19 March 1892 [EveningStar1892Mar19P3] then took the ss Rotorua and arrived at Wellington on 21 March [NzTim1892Mar21P2]. Presumably Mr J. Birnbaum had reached Dunedin from Melbourne [and a detailed search of these records might bear fruit].
Within 10 days of Mr J. Birnbaum’s arrival in Wellington, “Mr Birnbaum” joined the social activities of the day. He contributed to a program of song and silent tableaux (i.e., costumed recreations of historical events) in aid of St Paul’s organ enlargement fund in front of a packed audience at the Theatre Royal for two nights. In one tableau he played Jack in the Green and “caused much amusement”; he sang the nursey rhyme Jack and Jill with Miss F. Johnson, to an encore, then during the singing of Auld Robin Gray he was dressed as Jamie in sailor dress [WikiJackGn] [WikiAuldRobGry] [NzTim1892Mar30P2] [NzMail1892Apr08P5].
The hiring at the factory continued apace, with “Wanted, at once” advertisements for finishers [EveningPost1892Apr07P3], a good mangle and coat machinist, plus a strong lad [EveningPost1892Apr22P3], and an assistant stock cutter [EveningPost1892May19P3].
In May, there is a slight change to the advertisements: candidates are still “Wanted, at once” but now they are seeking smart candidates, and specifically six girls, as apprentices, to learn waterproof garment making [EveningPost1892May21P3]. Likely “smart” was being used in the sense of “smart appearance” given a later advert seeking a “smart, intelligent” candidate [EveningPost18920709P3].
Meanwhile the firm advertised “good, strong, empty cases, zinc lined” for sale [EveningPost1892May04P3]. This was the first of several occasions (for instance they were selling 50 zinc-lined cases and some tin-lined cases in August 1893 [EveningPost1893Aug02P3] [EveningPost1893Aug18P3], then more empty packing cases in September 1894  [EveningPost1894Sep19P3]). It seems that the firm was importing something regularly that needed careful protection, but what? Since we later learn that the waterproofed fabric was manufactured at “Home”, and that their Wellington operations were confined to cutting, sewing, gumming the seams and incorporating buttons/button holes [NzTim1894Apr24P3], then the more plausible candidates are delicate manufacturing equipment such as Singer sewing machines [EveningPost1893Apr17P3] on the one hand, or the waterproofed fabric on the other hand.
Next we learn that J.B. Birnbaum (surely the same J. Birnbaum as earlier) has a private residence on the Terrace, with a new telephone line [EveningPost1892Jun11P2].
Now it gets confusing since an I. Birnbaum (but not J. Birnbaum) is recorded as being presented at the Governor (Lord Glasgow’s) first levee [EveningPost1892Jun27P2] and an I. B. Birnbaum appears at the following Citizen’s Ball [EveningPost1892Jul05P2]. Presumably Isidore Birnbaum, son of the founder, had newly arrived from Australia/Britain yet reached New Zealand without his immigration records being readily accessible in the modern databases (not an uncommon situation), and for a time he became the public face of the firm. It is unknown whether the earlier songster “Mr Birnbaum” was Isidore or J.B. Birnbaum.
Meanwhile, the hunt for further smart employees continued through 1892: a smart, experienced machinist [EveningPost1892Feb06P3], a smart, intelligent boy [EveningPost1892Jul09P3], smart finishers [EveningPost1892Jul30P3] and a smart Improver Machinist [EveningPost1892Nov25P3].
Isidore’s mechanical bent can be ascertained from a patent he applied for in New Zealand in 1892 [EveningPost1892Oct06P3]:
An invention which will commend itself to persons who use kerosene and other crystal oils has been patented by Mr. Isidore Birnbaum, of the firm of Birnbaum and Son, waterproof manufacturers, Cornhill-street, Wellington. The apparatus is a galvanised iron vessel 19 inches deep and capable of holding ten gallons. It is provided with a lid on hinges, and is covered in near the top with a metal plate through which work a small pump and a telescopic syphon. The metal plate is curved so as to dip towards the centre, where there is a round hole about an inch in diameter. Through this hole the oil which it is intended the box should hold is poured, and when a person requires to draw any of it off, all he or she requires to do is to work the pump, and the oil runs out of the mouth of the syphon. Any oil which may drip out of the syphon finds its way back into the reservoir through the hole in the centre of the plate, and not a drop is lost. Another important feature of the invention is that when the lid is being closed a small metal shaft is pushed down, and a disc immediately stops up the round hole referred to, so that no evaporation can possibly take place. When the lid is down, the box, which is made of galvanised iron, and which holds ten gallons, is flame-proof, and a light can be placed against it without fear of an explosion. The apparatus, which ought to recoup any householder its cost in less than a year, will no doubt be extensively used in country districts, where gas is not obtainable. The invention is now on exhibition in Wilkins & Field's, Manners-street, and is well worthy of inspection.
A Mr Birnbaum went to the horse races in Christchurch [NzMail1892Nov11P15].
We further see that “Bernard Isidore Birnbaum” (surely I.B. Birnbaum aka Isidore Birnbaum) was a wine customer worthy of courting, with an interest in Yalumba claret. Also Isidore, then aged around 21 or 22 years affected a silver-crooked stick. [EveningPost1892Dec17P2] [NzTim1892Dec19P2].
Next we learn that J.B. Birnbaum departed Wellington on 28 December 1892 bound for Sydney on the ss Mararoa [Ancestry, NSW Unassisted Immigrant Passenger Lists, December 1892]. A Mr J.B. Birnbaum, listed as 30 years old (of an age with Henry Birnbaum), sailed just two days later from Melbourne on the ss Rotomahana at 30 December, 1892 with a ticket for Wellington [VicArch VPRS948/P00001, img379] [Press1893Jan04P6]. This was a lightning fast journey since, in this era, the railway journey from Melbourne to Sydney took 18-24 hours [Bradshaws1905] and so the duration of reverse journey can be assumed to be similar.  Given misbehavior by Isidore comes to light later, and given that telegraphic communication between Australia and New Zealand was possible since 1876 [TeAraTelegraphy]), one speculates that a complicated and/or private consultation was needed with the family in Australia then an urgent answer/decision was conveyed back.  Next, on 10 January 1893, a “Birnbaum” sailed from Wellington on the Manapouri for Melbourne via the south [Press1893Jan10P6]. Was this Isidore being dispatched from New Zealand in disgrace? Certainly he seems not to have returned for some time since his patent application, 5779, lapsed on 29 March 1894 [Ancestry, NZ Gazette, 29 March 1894, No. 25, P502].
Soon after there was an apparent cost-cutting exercise. The only apparent Birnbaum now in New Zealand (J.B. Birnbaum) departed Claremont House, an eleven room house with a splendid view of the city and harbor. As well “high-class and artistic household furnishings at the residence of Messrs. Birnbaum, and McLean” were put up for sale. Likely this is the same house on The Terrace that J.B. Birnbaum had occupied since June 1892 [EveningPost1892Jun11P2] [EveningPost1893Feb11P2] [EveningPost1893Feb11P3].
In parallel, more employees were wanted at once at the Cornhill St factory: now a cutter [EveningPost1893Jan09P4] and an improver for Singer machines [EveningPost1893Apr17P3]. Later an apprentice for coat finishing was wanted [EveningPost1893Jun06P3], and a lad to run errands and make himself useful [EveningPost1893Sep28P3]; then a smart lad [EveningPost1894Jan05P3], a good needle hand and more improvers [EveningPost1894Jan12P3]
The change of abode did not seem to impair Birnbaum’s social life, as follows. The United Hunt Club help a meet at “the Miramar estate” with various riders and dogs chasing first one hare then another. There were many spectators following behind including “Mr Birnbaum” who drove a dogcart containing Miss Dyer and Mrs John McClean [NzTim1893May22P2]. Further we hear than “Mr J. Birnbaum” was among the 600 persons invited to the Birthday Ball at Government House hosted by the Governor, Lord Glasgow, and his wife Lady Glasgow [EveningPost1893May25P4].
Later the firm received thankful acknowledgement for donating a pound towards Christmas festivities for patients in hospital (presumably Wellington Hospital) at the time [EveningPost1893Dec28P2].
 

Stamp Adverts

Their first Birnbaum advertising in New Zealand was their 1893 underprint design on the Second Side Faces. Since instructions in relation to the advert designs were being provided by businesses around mid-December 1892 [TaranakiHer1893Oct03P2], it is plausible that Isidore Birnbaum was responsible for authorising B. Birnbaum and Son’s advert design.
 

The Victoria St Factory in New Zealand

In mid-1893, something is going on in Christchurch but the fragmentary history leaves the modern inquirer in the dark. Certainly a second Mr Birnbaum arrived at Lyttelton on 10 July 1893 from Newcastle [FamSearBirnbaum], then another “Birnbaum” (J.B.) reached there too, perhaps from Wellington, on July 18 [Press1893Jul19P6]. Another week or so later again, the Cokers Hotel reports that “J.B. Birnbaum” was visiting Christchurch [Press1893Jul29P8]. Were they considering whether to move their New Zealand base of operations to Christchurch? If so, nothing came of it.
Instead, the first Christchurch connection is not until October 1894, when it seems B. Birnbaum and Son seeded an article in the Christchurch Star. The apparent goal of the piece was to raise the firm’s profile, and report that their waterproofs would be in stock in the “leading drapers, outfitters, and clothiers in the colony.” [Star1894Oct30P3]
Next a (third?) “Mr Birnbaum” arrived at Bluff in 8 September 1893, aged 27 (of an age with Theodore or Rudolph Birnbaum), from Melbourne on the Wairarapa and paid to Wellington [FamSearBirnbaum27]. We infer that he espied something of note in Dunedin and disembarked there because there is also a record of a Birnbaum from Dunedin on the Flora headed for the north on 11 September [Press1893Sep12P6].
These travels and deliberations seem to have reinforced their decision to remain in Wellington, and indeed embark on a purpose-built facility close by, on Victoria St. William C. Chatfield was engaged as architect, and tenders for erection of a four-floor “warehouse” were solicited at the end of October 1893 [EveningPost1893Oct28P3].
Construction was swift, since the building was open by April 1894 [NzTim1894Apr24P3] (and [NzMail1894Apr27P32]), with the following description:
NEW FACTORY. MESSRS B. BIRNBAUM AND SON.
The firm of Birnbaum and Son (Limited), waterproof manufacturers, have recently removed from their former premises in Cornhill street to larger and more comfortable quarters in a building erected to the order of Mr Jacob Joseph [i.e., owner according to [EveningPost1897Jun05P5]] in Victoria street. The change was made with great expedition, for, although the order for the removal was not given until the afternoon of Friday week last, the machinery had been removed, and all the hands were at work in the new building by the usual time on the following Monday morning.
The new building is a business-like and commodious brick structure, faced with cement, with an extreme height of 67 ft and 61ft to the parapet, the frontage being 41ft and the depth 60ft. Passing through a handsome entrance 7ft wide, and provided with cedar and plate glass swing doors, one finds on the right the office of the manager for New Zealand (Mr W. R. C. Fox). Mr Fox is a gentleman of very wide business experience gained in every quarter of the globe, and under his energetic sway the business promises to assume very large proportions. His office is a nicely furnished apartment, 14ft 6in by 14ft, the ceiling and walls being lined with red pine, and varnished. To the left of the entrance is the clerks’ office, under the superintendence of Mr E. Peters, managing clerk [and attorney [NzTim1894Mar21P1]]; it is 14ft 6in by 23ft, and is provided with all necessary accessories, including a telephone, and speaking tubes to all the floors. At the rear of the manager’s office is a well fitted up room, specially arranged for samples and for indenting goods. Behind these offices is a packing room, 32ft by 36ft, in which the goods as they come down from the factory are packed up in readiness for transmission to various parts of New Zealand, wide doorways facilitating the work of despatching them to their destination. In the far left-hand comer is a hydraulic lift, travelling to the top of the building past the various floors. It was manufactured by Messrs Luke and Son, is provided with Seagar valves, and works as smoothly and satisfactorily as possible.
Returning to the entrance, and passing up a handsome staircase, the showroom and warehouse is reached. This is a handsome room, 57ft by 38ft, beautifully lit by large windows, and admirably adapted for the display of goods, Here may be seen excellent specimens of the work turned out in the factory – natty driving waterproofs, featherweight ladies’ ulsters, gig aprons, and in fact every variety of the lighter classes of waterproof goods, of a style and shape which must commend them to the purchasing public. The best feature of it is that, with the exception of the proofing, which is made at Home, the manufacture of these garments is carried out on the premises, as was apparent on proceeding further with a visit of inspection we recently paid to the factory, On the second floor is the cutters’ room, a well-appointed apartment of the same dimensions as the showroom, and under the charge of Mr Heald, the head cutter. Here it is that the material is cut out ready to be made up by the other hands, the single textures being manipulated on one side of the room, and the double textures on the other. In one corner is a three-horse power gas engine by Crossley, used for driving the sewing and other machines, and a waterpower machine, by J, T. Glover, of the Queen’s Foundry, Wellington, for use in cases of emergency. On the same floor is a comfortable dining-room, provided for the convenience of the girls working in the factory — a convenience, we may add, which is greatly appreciated.
On the top floor of the building is the workroom, also the same size as the showroom, and it is at once apparent that the workers are not in any way handicapped by bad ventilation or the want of proper appliances, but on the contrary, their convenience and health appear to have received the utmost consideration. The room is lofty and well ventilated, the workers have ample elbow room, although the full number of hands is employed, and altogether the occupants seem to be working under the happiest conditions. The number of hands all told is 52. All the machines are worked by the gas engine already mentioned, the work thus being less laborious, while the firm are enabled to get more work done in the same time (a very fair exchange, by the way), and that the operators present a healthful appearance and work with cheerful vigour is not therefore to be wondered at.
The manner in which waterproof garments are made cannot be explained in the short limits of a newspaper article, but we may say that the greatest attention is paid to the finish of the garments, the seams being not only gummed together with a specially prepared solution, but firmly sown throughput, thus avoiding any danger of the seams gaping open, an experience only too well-known to purchasers of waterproofs. The button-holes are all made by machines, which perform the work in a truly expeditious manner, and finish it off most neatly,, while there is also a machine for button-making — a most ingenious contrivance – and another for ventilating coats. Mr Chas. Drew occupies the position of foreman, and appears thoroughly capable of filling the responsible position in which he is placed.
The electric light is to be installed throughout the building, it being considered better than gas, as it does not attract the naphtha in the material to the eyes of the workers. Speaking tubes are provided on each floor, the sanitary arrangements are as satisfactory as can be desired, and the Factory Inspectors speak in-terms of high appreciation of the manner in which the work has been carried out for the comfort and convenience of those employed.
The building was erected by Mr M. Murdock, contractor, from designs furnished by Mr W. C. Chatfield, architect; Mr Bruce was clerk of the works, the sub-contractors being: —Hayes and Co., plumbers; Oughton and Chote, bricklayers; and E. and B. Tingey, painters.
The Wellington branch has been established since February, 1892, the head office being at 33, London Wall, London, and the factory at Wick Lane, Bow. There are also branches at New York and Melbourne, and the kind of work turned out is shown by the medals won by their exhibits at exhibitions at Vienna, Santiago, Paris, Sydney, Melbourne and Dunedin. The trade mark of the firm, curiously enough, is a pear tree, the word “Birnbaum” being German for pear tree, while the initial letter “B” is represented by an active honey-bee close to the tree.
In April, Fox is manager, and there is no record of a Birnbaum in the country any longer (but no readily accessible record of them leaving either). Indeed there is no record of a birth, death or marriage of a Birnbaum in New Zealand [NzBdm].
Such a substantial building might have survived for some time and be belatedly photographed. A key question then is its street number. We learn that Abbott and Oram later took over the building [EveningPost1897Jun05P5] and, according to the 1907 edition of Kelly's Directory of Merchants, Manufacturers and Shippers they occupied number 26 (or possibly 20 or 28 since the scan is unclear) [KellyGoogleBooks, P187] [P187] yet in 1909 they occupied numbers 40-42 [Dominion1909Mar12P2]. Was there a renumbering exercise in between? Regardless, early photos of Victoria St are hard to come by, though these drawings might have promise [NatLibAltVicSt].
  

Isidore’s Disgrace

From earlier. we know that 10 January 1893, a “Birnbaum” departed Wellington on the Manapouri for Melbourne via the south [Press1893Jan10P6], and that Isidore Birnbaum’s name did not come up thereafter in New Zealand newspapers; so he is presumed to have departed on that sailing in disgrace.
It is conceivable that Isidore Birnbaum’s departure is explained by a subsequent court case, albeit this presumes 15 months had elapsed between his misbehavior and the court case; but this delay could be explained by a period of desultory discussions outside the legal process that did not converge, followed by legal action and then, ultimately, the court proceedings.
The court case pertained to complicated wrangling as to whether a mere manager of a foreign firm had the right to sue on behalf of the firm, but the origins of the dispute are clear: “Mr Birnbaum junr” (surely Isidore, who was then aged around 22; versus J.B Birnbaum who was noted as 30 years old on one crossing), while local manager for B. Birnbaum and Son, had pawned some £34 worth of waterproof coats and the like, but “had no right to pledge the property of the firm, and therefore the goods or their equivalent should be restored.” [EveningPost1894Apr12P3]
The strong implication is that Isidore had run up debts which he could not pay and which the family would not pay either, and so he secretively leveraged his position at the factory to borrow/steal the waterproofs and turn them into some money via a handy pawnbroker. We can only suspect the reason, but presumably involves the usual human frailties of gambling (on horses?) and/or amorous activities, with wine as a lubricant.
Two more newspaper articles on the case impart some information about the Birnhaum travels yet are a little confusing, so both are included with a consistent (and presumed correct) interpretation provided in braces.
From [NzTim1894Apr13P2], “… For the plaintiff the point was raised that Mr [Isidore] Birnbaum, junr., was manager of the company, that in that capacity he had no right to pledge the property of the firm, and therefore the goods or their value should be restored. Mr Skerrett, in reply, urged that the company could not sue because it was clearly stated in its articles of association that before they could proceed in any action at law the power of attorney to do so must be signed by the manager and a director jointly. The case must fall through as the manager [Isidore] was away from the Colony, and had not left the necessary power of attorney [because he departed in a hurry, in disgrace]. His Worship reserved his decision on the point raised.
 
From [EveningPost1894Apr30P2], “The case was one in which Birnbaum & Co., Limited, waterproof manufacturers of London. Melbourne, and Wellington, sued G. W. Smart, pawnbroker, Manners-street, for £30 odd, being the value of waterproof coats &c, some time ago pawned by Mr. [Isidore] Birnbaum, junr, then local manager for the Company.  … The case was partly heard last week, and on that occasion whilst the facts were not denied, it was contended by Mr. Skerrett that the case must fall through, as the power of attorney empowering Messrs. Peters [the attorney] and [Isidore] Birnbaum, jun., the local representatives of the firm when the goods referred to were pawned [by Isidore] was void [at the time that legal proceedings were brought], Mr. [Isidore] Birnbaum having left the colony without his power of attorney having been delegated to his successor [Fox]. To-day Mr. W. R. C. Fox, the successor of Mr. [Isidore] Birnbaum, was put into the box, but whilst he had a letter from the managing director [Bernard Birnbaum?] showing he was to take the management of the Wellington business, he [Fox] could produce no power of attorney from the directors to show he was to sue or be sued on behalf of the company.
 

Newspaper Adverts

After the 1893 stamp underprints, there was a long hiatus in the firm’s advertising, perhaps as Mr Fox got his feet, and then a stream of newspaper advertisements began from April 1894, with many including the bee and pear tree:
  • “Waterproofs | B. Birnbaum, & Son, | (Limited) | Waterproof Clothing Manufacturers | London, New York, Melbourne, Wellington | Ask for no other make, ours have world-wide reputation …” [EveningPost1894Apr25P4].
  • “Eight pages of well-engraved illustrations will be given, including …. Birnbaum & Son” [NzTim1894Dec06P3]
    • Regretfully these illustrations do not seem to have been preserved
  • “Waterproof Garments | B. Birnbaum & Son, | Limited | London and Wellington, | (Established 35 years) | Pear Tree Brand … Draw attention to the fact that their Garments are all Guaranteed Waterproof | Are Sewn and Stuck in Every Part, | Are Made By the Best Skilled Labour …” [EveningPost1895Feb07P4].
    • This is the first newspaper advert to bear the same pear tree design as on the stamps
    • The motto Industriae Nil Impossibile translates as “with industry, nothing is impossible”.
  • “Waterproof Garments | B. Birnbaum & Son, | Limited | London and Wellington, | (Established 35 years) | … Buy the Pear Tree Brand and You Will Secure a Real Waterproof” [EveningPost1895Mar28P4]
    • Also bears the pear tree design.
  • “Important Notice | B. Birnbaum & Son (Ltd.) guarantee all their “Pear tree” Garments waterproof” [EveningPost1895Apr09P1]
  • “Birnbaum “Pear Tree” Waterproofs | Are made in light and heavy textures and are sewn throughout.” [WairarapaDaiTim1895Apr11P3]
  • “Health is Everything! Wear Birnbaum’s Waterproofs … They Will Prevent You Taking Cold | Hosiers, Hatters, Drapers and Storekeepers Stock Them” [EveningPost1895May27P4]
    • Also bears the pear tree design.
A New Zealand trade-mark was recorded in the New Zealand Gazette published on 21 June 1894.

 
There are also some glowing articles that verge on advertising, such as “One of the leading waterproof manufacturing houses in the world, is that of Messrs Birnbaum and Son, Ltd. This firm has for more than half a century been established in England, and some time ago they opened a branch house in New Zealand, the headquarters of which are in Wellington. The firm’s waterproofs are undoubtedly the leading goods in the market, from the fact that they possess advantages not seen in other manufactures. For instance, the Pear Tree brand waterproofs are specially proofed for the New Zealand climate, they are admirably ventilated by a patent process, they are manufactured in light and heavy textures, and sewn throughout, not gummed together as many similar goods are, and above all, Messrs B. Birnbaum & Son, Ltd., guarantee their manufactures as absolutely waterproof.” [WairarapaDaiTim1895Apr11P2].
 

Business Is Booming

The new factory received many plaudits including a tour by the Governor of the day, His Excellency David Boyle, Earl of Glasgow, in August 1894. The Governor “expressed himself as being highly pleased with the manner in which the establishment was conducted.” [WikiNzGovGen]
Furthermore, Mr Fox seems to have been well-chosen to replace Isidore Birnbaum: “Since Mr W.R.C. took over the management of the firm in the Colony the business transacted has increased to an enormous extent, and on all sides the quality of the goods sent out has been most highly spoken of. Already orders are coming in freely for the 1895 season, the new patterns are being rapidly taken up, and under its present able management the industry is making such strides as bid fair to place it amongst the foremost in the Colony.”
Another article [WikiNzGovGen], possibly drafted by Mr Fox, relays the company background then includes some interesting nuggets:
  • “About six months ago [i.e., February 1894] Mr W. R, C. Fox, a gentleman of wide business experience, gained in every part of the globe, and an expert in the manufacture and sale of waterproof goods accepted the position of manager for New Zealand … at once he succeeded in putting the business on a solid foundation by his energy, tact, geniality and commercial acumen”
    • The level of positivity seems a little suspicious
  • “The splendid premises now occupied by the firm were at once taken and the factory removed from the temporary building in Cornhill Street, off Manners Street”
    • Planning probably preceded Mr Fox, but certainly the execution under his leadership was superb
  • “The output for New Zealand was very quickly doubled and the firm now sells a dozen waterproofs where one of another make is bought.”
    • Those are really strong numbers, and worthy of much pride
  • “The firm manufactures almost entirely in the Colony for local consumption, thereby reducing the cost to the buyer by the amount of duty payable on the articles imported, as the raw material comes duty free”
    • As above, duty was probably less than 10%, so other reasons – such as offering a local product and nurturing the business experience of his sons – may have played a part too. If the latter item was a goal, then regretfully, for Isidore at least, it did not work out.
B. Birnbaum & Son, presumably under the authority of Mr Fox, made a mild foray into politics. The firm, along with a few score other ratepayers, encouraged the politically connected Maurice Cameron to run for representative of Lambton Ward [EveningPost1894Aug18P3] [DunstanTim1894May25P3]. Apparently Cameron demurred and instead nominated Thomas Macdonald [EveningPost1893Nov20P2], who was duly elected [EveningPost1893Dec01P3].
Fox extended the firm’s operations into the South Island too. A permanent stock and sample room was opened in Dunedin, on MacClaggan St. It targeted drapers and outfitters, so likely was not a retail outlet [Eveningstar1894Aug27P3]. Mr Austen was manager there [EveningStar1894Oct18P2] [EveningStar1894Nov09P2].
Fox was also busy innovating, and specifically devised – and patented – an improved ventilation system [EveningPost1894Sep11P2]. This would have been peculiarly important since rubber clothing cannot breathe. In the modern era, the solution to this problem is a breathable waterproof fabric (e.g., Gore-Tex) or underarm vents. [It would be interesting to discover Fox’s solution and his patent text.]
Birnbaum wares were also exhibited directly by retailers; for instance at the North Otago A&P Show [NorthOtagoTim1894Nov14P3] and the Wellington A&P Show [EveningPost1894Nov15P4]. The firm received publicity in other ways, such as by lending their transformer for lighting a musical festival at the Opera House in Wellington [EveningPost1894Sep29P3].
We learn of the range of waterproofs being manufactured by the firm from a report of the Wellington A&P Show [NzTim1894Nov15P3]: “Prominent among the exhibits waterproofs of the Pear Tree Brand, manufactured by the well-known firm of B. Birnbaum arid Son, whose mackintoshes have made so favourable an impression upon the public of late. They include some remarkably handsome mackintosh garments for summer and winter wear, ventilated on the most approved principle, and made in textures specially adapted for both ladies and gentlemen. There are also handsome riding and driving coats, carriage rugs, &c., all beautifully finished and of a quality which cannot fail to commend themselves to persons in want of such articles. The whole of the exhibit has been disposed of by Mr W. R. C. Fox, manager of the firm, to Messrs Davis and Clater, drapers and clothiers; of Lambton quay, who have arranged them at the far end of the Shed in a manner which cannot fail to attract the attention of visitors.” The next year, in 1895, the firm receives a similar mention but now includes “golf capes, racing coats, … ladies’ and gentlemen’s silk summer texture mantles, … sponge bags, waterproof saddle-cloths and waterproof bathing hoods for ladies’ wear.”
An article for the Otago A&P Show lists “waterproof rugs, buggy rugs, and men’s and women’s cloaks and overalls … leggings, bottle caps, brake blocks, bicycle capes, and waterbottles …” [EveningStar1894Nov29P2]. Bicycle capes and hold-alls are also mentioned [NorthOtagoTim1894Dec07P2].
In December 1894, a Birnbaum is recorded as having sailed from Wellington for south and thence Melbourne. This might be J.B. Birnbaum finally departing after living quietly in New Zealand for nearly two years, but more probably was one leg of a flying visit (with the other leg lost to history) by a Birnbaum to check up on Mr Fox’s progress [Press1894Dec22P9].
In February 1895, E. Peters, known earlier as the firm’s accountant and sometimes attorney, was joining the head office in London. Mr Gee reported that Peters already had 12 years of service with them firm (presumably at Melbourne and Wellington).  This is first time Mr Gee is named in connection with the firm, and is described as “the Melbourne partner” [EveningPost1895Feb02P2].
Surely as part of a plan to replace E. Peters, the firm had advertised a few weeks earlier for a new bookkeeper, with knowledge of double entry [EveningPost1895Jan22P3]. “Waterproof hands” were also wanted, for good wages [EveningPost1895Jan31P3].
Joseph Gee was a useful businessman, being able to secure a reduction in city assessments related for their Victoria St factory, from £400 to £300 [EveningPost1895Apr06P4]. He was also a writer of popular songs, including “The Vision Song” performed by Maggie Moore in Australia, with over 5000 copies sold [Observer1895Apr13P15][NzTim1895Apr19P3]. [It would be interesting if the lyrics and/or music could be found.]
Charity contributions were made the firm or its employees: £5 from the firm to the Unemployed Relief Works Fund (i.e., a fund to pay the unemployed to work on a selected project of benefit to the public) [EveningPost1895Aug03P2], and £3 8/- 6d from the employees to the Brunner Disaster Relief Fund [NzTim1896Apr11P3]. The latter was in response to the March 1896 explosion deep in the mine, which killed all 65 miners inside [WikiBrunner].
The practice of farewelling employees leaving for England continued; this time for Miss Duff (with Mr Drew and Mr Juhl also named) [EveningPost1895Aug17P2].
Then there was “The Telephone Case”. Crabtree & Sons had a very similar telephone number as an ironfoundry, Luke & Co. Occasionally, Luke & Co. received a call intended for Crabtree & Sons. (This was in an era of three digit telephone numbers). Employees at Crabtree & Sons were not always as forthright as one might like, and sometimes led on the caller of the wrong number. For instance a Jones from the Wairapapa was quoted (by a Crabtree & Sons employee) a two month lead time to manufacture a 4-horse engine. Worse was when a Lomax called for old iron rails and was told (by a Crabtree & Sons employee) that none were in stock yet Luke & Co. certainly did have them and they were ready for sale. At some point Crabtree & Sons discovered the tomfoolery, the Telephone Department held an inquiry and Crabtree & Sons sued Luke & Co. for telephone misuse in the amount of £4.
The employee mischief appeared to extend to their own management too. Here Birnbaum & Co. called the wrong number, and John P. Luke takes up the story: “On a Saturday in May or June last the office boy told him [John P. Luke] that Birnbaum & Co. had been ringing him up in reference to some castings. In the Monday he went down to the firm, when they told him they had never rang him up [at Luke & Co.] at all. He complained to his clerks of being sent on a fool’s errand.”
The magistrate took a hard line with the Luke & Co. (“The way the telephone was looked after was scandalous”) and penalised them court costs of 48/- and solicitors’ costs of £10 10/-. [EveningPost1895Nov25P2] [NzTim1895Nov25P2]
The hiring at Birnbaum & Son continued through for the first half of 1896: machinists and machinist improvers for Singer’s sewing machines [EveningPost1896Jan17P3] with those used to waterproof work preferred [EveningPost1896Apr16P3]; and also a good practical cutter [EveningPost1896May01P3] .
The 1897 Cyclopedia of New Zealand [CycloNzWellBirnbaum] reported “Birnbaum, B., and Son, Limited. Head office, 33 London Wall, London. Factory, Wick Lane. Rubber works, Bow. Branches, New York and at Melbourne. Wellington branch, Victoria Street. This large concern was established many years ago by Mr. B. Birnbaum, the Wellington branch dating from 1892. The building—a substantial four-story brick structure—is very complete, and furnishes full accommodation for the various branches of the trade, being fitted with a large lift, and brilliantly lighted throughout by electric light. The offices are on the ground floor, the stock and show-rooms being on the first flat. On the second floor is the cutting department, while the factory proper is found on the top floor, about forty hands finding permanent employment. The motive power is a gas engine, supplemented by a water motor in case of a breakdown. Every description of waterproof garment is made on the premises. The Company have been large prize-winners at the various British and intercolonial exhibitions.”
 

Epilogue

The Cyclopedia material (above) was presumably compiled before the end of 1896 since, in July 1896, the Birnbaum & Son had left Melbourne [TheAge1896Jul27P2] and, in September, they had announced their intent to close their Wellington factory [EveningPost189622P4]: “According to its usual practice after establishing a business in a new country, the firm of Messrs. B. Birnbaum and Sons intends to close its waterproof factory in this city. Mr. Joseph Gee, of Melbourne, one of the directors of the firm, is now in Wellington arranging matters in connection with the closing of the manufacturing portion of the business. The firm does not rely upon agents in pushing its goods, but when extending its business to a new country it establishes a factory there, employs local labour, and furnishes on the spot a similar article to that produced at its English factories. Once the goods are firmly established in favour, the firm closes up its local factories and supplies a better article from its central factory. Factories for the introduction of the firm’s goods had been opened in Russia, the United States, Canada, and Australia, and after establishing a demand for the manufactures, the factories in these countries have been closed. That we are informed is the position in connection with the shutting-up of the New Zealand branch of the manufacturing business.”
To the modern reader, this account seems a little curious, and even smacks of public relations spin since the firm had invested heavily in their building, equipment and staff in New Zealand. An alternative explanation may be that the business case of the Australasian branches was weak, Bernard was now around 65, and – given the departure of Bernard’s son Isidore – there was no side-benefit of training the next generation of the family in the business.
By December 1896 Birnbaum & Sons had “recently dropped the local trade” [NzMail1896Dec03P52]. Their stock was transferred to Messrs Ross & Glendining for retail sale [WairarapaDaiTim1897Feb19P3] [DailyTelegraph1897Feb19P3], and this handover was advertised until the end of the year [WestCoastTim1897Dec24P4].
Isidore Birnbaum married in Marylebone, London in Apr-Jun 1900 [Ancestry, England and Wales Civil Registration Marriage Index, 1837-1915, Volume 1a, p1158].
Bernard Birnbaum died on 12 August 1911, aged 81 [BritishNewspaperArchive, e.g., East London Observer, 26 August 1911].
Obituary of Bernard Birnbaum. Credit: East London Observer - Saturday 26 August 1911 Image © THE BRITISH LIBRARY BOARD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.


The company continued for some years thereafter:
  • They advertised in Vogue in 1916 [NewYorkPubLib]
  • They were gazetted as a contractor for the Admiralty in 1926 [MoLGazMay1926, P34]
  • Their last British newspaper reference was in 28 July 1926 [BritishNewspaperArchive, Westminster Gazette, 28 July 1926, P12]
It is unclear how B. Birnbaum & Son Ltd ultimately ended, since it seems to have just faded out.